Two Charlies: Charlie Kirk and Charlie Schumer
The Constitutionist
Free Newsletter
Items, Analysis, Opinions and News Gathered from Everywhere
By Steven Maikoski, Author: “The Real Constitution and its Real Enemies”
constitutionist@protonmail.com
Charlie Kirk’s murder truly has been a shot heard ‘round the world. Last night at Lake Havasu’s London Bridge, over a thousand people paid their respects to Charlie Kirk’s legacy during a candlelight vigil; the local, liberal leaning newspaper said that it was hundreds.
The shot has echoed on nearly every college campus in the United States and internationally.
In England, there has been a resurgence in the display of the Union Jack, along with flags adorned with the Cross of Saint George. Millions of people (see the photo) gathered in London, chanting to take England back from its new immigrants who want to change everything.
There’s a saying: “You can’t bring there to here, without here becoming there.” Vast numbers of new immigrants have been colonizing London, instead of embracing the culture of their new home.
Does this sound familiar? It sounds like Minnesota to me, and New York City is now at risk.
As I review many videos of Charlie Kirk, his knowledge of events and biblical scripture amazes me, almost as much as the foolishness of those who challenged his intellect and opinions. He was never angry; the arguments could not ruffle his calm demeanor. When he was challenged, he smiled and rose to savor the moment. But this can’t be said for his hectors.
Over the years, I was amused by the people who claimed that Charlie was arrogant, racist, a Nazi, hateful, intolerant, etc. Check out this dude: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/HGyZTi0ddqM
But that man is a nobody. He is not respected, intelligent, or influential. Sadly, we cannot say the same thing about Senator Charles Schumer, who has used his intelligence and position of power in the United States Senate to castigate conservatives at every opportunity. (I thought of providing a bunch of his hate-filled quotes, but won’t…for now) He has read his invidious notes into the Congressional Record. People listen to him and believe what he says. His words affect the opinions and actions of many others. He is the concert master of this narrative, with a supporting role played by Elizabeth Warren.
While on Warren, she is quite intelligent and well-educated, but she lacks honesty and morality. Like so many of her party group, her oath of office is a blatant lie. As her tribe would say, she speaks with a forked tongue.
The democrats have been pushing their narrative in all channels. They got what they wanted.Some nutcase listened to them and decided to take out a future president.
The blatant truth: Murderer Tyler Robinson turned out to be a sexual pervert, living with a transgender male-to-female person, if I can use that term. Over time, freak behavior like his was hidden; people usually sought help. Now they demand power and rights over others, and worse, the power to kill those who threaten their safety. Given the evidence delivered by various shootings and murders, these perverts are dangerous people.
Should transgender individuals be registered? Should they be allowed to purchase firearms? Will Chuck Schumer want that restriction?
My point here is that morality is an essential factor in any society, especially in a government where citizens vote for their officials. James Adams said it best, but everybody quotes only a line or two of his address to the Massachusetts Militia on October 11, 1798. Here’s the entire paragraph; take your time reading his essential thoughts:
“While our Country remains untainted with the Principles and manners, which are now producing desolation in so many Parts of the World: while she continues Sincere and incapable of insidious and impious Policy: We shall have the Strongest Reason to rejoice in the local destination assigned Us by Providence.
But should the People of America, once become capable of that deep simulation towards one another and towards foreign nations, which assumes the Language of Justice and moderation while it is practicing Iniquity and Extravagance; and displays in the most captivating manner the charming Pictures of Candour frankness & sincerity while it is rioting in rapine and Insolence: this Country will be the most miserable Habitation in the World.
Because We have no Government armed with Power capable of contending with human Passions unbridled by morality and Religion. Avarice, Ambition, Revenge or Galantry, would break the strongest Cords of our Constitution as a Whale goes through a Net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
In many of my writings, I have cited the speech that Benjamin Franklin delivered at the end of the Constitutional Convention in 1787. He said that our government would last until the people became so corrupted that they would only accept a corruptible government. The moral lapse precedes any corruption, which is why we need to correct that course.
Charlie Kirk was criticized by many who claimed that he was promoting Christian Nationalism, but if you listened to his course, he was a Christian, but was also a constitutional moralist; he advocated moral nationalism. That allows the other moral religions to be included.
Democrats don’t like that.
The last picture in the threesome is a screenshot from GROK, Elon Musk’s AI program. I began discussing the meaning of fascism and continued to disagree with the program’s interpretation. In the process, I argued that the depiction of the Constitution as a right-wing instrument was faulty. I then asked about the Constitutional Initial Point (which I designed and introduced), and received the answer you see above. GROK liked it. Cool.
Constitution Day is September 17th!
Have a good week!
Steve
Comments
Post a Comment