What is the Democrats’ end game? What is their plan? 

The Constitutionist

Free Newsletter
Items, Analysis, Opinions and News Gathered from Everywhere
By Steven Maikoski, Author: “The Real Constitution and its Real Enemies”

constitutionist@protonmail.com

This last week’s events, especially the controversy over the repatriation of a gang member back to his home country, have confirmed that President Trump is fighting a democrat party that is continuing, from the Biden presidency on, to seek a total change, possibly by dismemberment, of this nation.

The democrats know they must stop the President from exposing and dismantling the crooked party machinery that has infected most of our federal government and enriched their friends for decades. He has revealed the billions of dollars of corrupt financing going to foreign and bureaucratic wormholes, and at times to enemies of our nation! So, Trump has been the focus of their disrespect and political attacks since he took office, starting with the Mueller investigations, the political impeachments, the tearing of the SOTU speech, lawfare at state levels, and the assassination attempts. 

One statement this week from the newspaper THE HILL perfectly illustrates the campaign of deliberate misinformation being distributed to the public by a “trusted” newspaper:

Sen. Chris Van Hollen’s (D-Md.) trip to El Salvador to visit a mistakenly deported constituent has thrust the mild-mannered lawmaker into a major battle with the Trump administration as it doubles down on its pledge to keep Kilmar Abrego Garcia imprisoned abroad.

The “mistakenly deported constituent” is a stretch of the data; the fact is that Garcia was in the U.S. illegally, or, in demo-crafty language, was undocumented. His gang associations are known and confirmed, but now are denied. Lie and deny is a common tactic of criminals.

Biden's opening of our borders may prove to be the worst thing that has happened to this nation in the last one hundred and ninety years. There were no controls and no desire by the Democratic cult to monitor the quality of the people crossing the border. And so the worst people got in by design, and the Democrats want them to stay here, including Kilmar Garcia.

Constitutional Attorney Jonathan Emord discussed the matter on my favorite radio show The Wilkow Majority (on Sirius XM): I believe he started with: it is ridiculous….

“…to say that people with uniforms on who invade the nation with weapons, that that is war, but if they came in through a Trojan Horse, that would not be war. I mean, this is essentially what they’re saying. Furthermore, who is to decide whether there is an enemy combatant, an enemy of the United States in the United States? Is that the court’s determination or the President’s? No, it’s the President’s.

As Commander-In-Chief, fundamentally, he has the power to protect the nation. As part of that, he has the power to determine who’s an enemy and who’s not. That’s not a determination to be made by a judge. 

And so, they need to defer to the president, they need to understand that that is a political question to which the president is uniquely situated to make a determination. 

Now, the President could get it wrong and we can vote him out, but the President here has gotten it right. These people are here illegally. Many of them are members of gangs. 

Those gangs are here for the purpose of looting, raping, pillaging and destroying property, and engaging in trafficking of drugs and children and everything else. 

So, I mean that he is acting within his power as Commander-In-Chief, and the courts should stand down. They should recognize this as a political question. 

It is one thing if the president overstepped his bounds and took someone who had questions about whether they were here illegally. Okay, that requires a full blown hearing on the merits. But if someone is admittedly here illegally, as is this case, there’s no substantive question, there’s no right at issue. And the process that was due is what he’s (Garcia) getting. And he’s brought back to his own country, El Salvador.”

President Trump has properly dealt with the matter; there were no mistakes in the illegal resident’s repatriation; it was not a deportation. Garcia was sent back to his home country. 

Why a Senator would travel to a foreign country and openly protest our President is part of their plan. They will show disrespect for Trump at every opportunity—and it’s just getting started. 

The democrats’ propaganda machine is working well, as confirmed by the attacks on unrelated Tesla cars and dealerships, and the party organized protests in over forty cities this weekend.

The group holding the protests this weekend is 50501, meaning fifty states, fifty protests, one movement. On their website, they claim, “The first #50501 protests were a decentralized rapid response to the anti-democratic and illegal actions of the Trump administration and its plutocratic allies.”

Plutocratic? What happened to the Oligarchy? Oh, since Bernie and AOC were taking a private jet to the protests, they revealed themselves as oligarchs, so the democrats can’t use that term anymore. 

They 50501 group claims to support our Constitution and its democracy. Even a sleazy used-car salesman is not that dishonest. We should ask where their politics are headed; obviously, not for a constitutional government.

Here is where I get back to the concept of dismemberment, which many politicians sought at the time of the writing of our Constitution. One of them, Patrick Henry, desired the division of our nation into several confederacies. That change would give some people vast powers and riches without contending with a restrictive constitution. 

Now, imagine California being ruled by the Democratic faction. For fun, add the other blue states, Washington and Oregon, to the West Coast Confederacy. They would control most of the imports and trade from their new nation-states.

Imagine the wealth and power that would be generated for Gavin and Nancy.

The democrats are dividing the nation into vastly separate political groups for a reason,

and it’s not for the love of our constitutional government. They are up to something. I'd like to know if you have a different idea.

Steven Maikoski